Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41536177›Full record

ArticleThoracic research and practice2026

Artificial Intelligence in Pleural Diseases: Current Applications and Next Steps.

Ferhan Karataş, Öner Dikensoy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thoracic research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ferhan KarataşDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, Koç University Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-4025-3446
Öner DikensoyDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, Koç University Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-1161-6225

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pleural diseases pose a significant burden on healthcare systems due to diagnostic challenges and high costs. Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to provide faster, more accurate, and more reliable results in the diagnosis of these diseases. This review evaluates the current status of AI technologies in the diagnosis of pleural effusion (PE), malignant PE, tuberculosis pleurisy (TP), pneumothorax, and malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Deep learning algorithms developed for radiological diagnosis provide high sensitivity and specificity in determining the presence and severity of PE. AI models that integrate clinical parameters such as chest computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET)-CT, and tumour markers in distinguishing between benign and malignant effusions have significantly improved diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve: >0.90). In cytological diagnosis, computer-assisted systems such as Aitrox have demonstrated performance comparable to that of expert cytopathologists in diagnosing malignant effusions. In the diagnosis of TP, AI models outperform conventional diagnostic methods, particularly when combined with laboratory parameters such as adenosine deaminase. Food and Drug Administration-approved AI models are effectively used for the rapid diagnosis of pneumothorax and for emergency interventions. In MPM diagnosis, AI models using PET-CT images and three-dimensional segmentation offer significant advantages in prognostic evaluation and treatment response monitoring. However, large-scale, multi-centre studies are needed to standardise and generalise AI models. In light of these developments, AI may fundamentally change the diagnostic management of pleural diseases.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligencediagnostic methodsmesotheliomapleural diseasespneumothoraxtuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID41536177
PMCPMC12862285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.