SynthesisJournal of surgical oncology2026
Disparities in Breast Cancer Screening, Diagnosis, and Outcomes Among Vietnamese American Women: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Journal of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Colorectal Cancer Outcomes Among Disaggregated Asian Subgroups: a 2006-2020 SEER Analysis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Observational
- Review
- The Breast Cancer Awareness and Risk Education for Asian Americans (Breast CARE): a community-based patient education program for breast cancer screening and prevention.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Secondhand smoke and breast health awareness among Vietnamese American families in California: A mixed-methods study.Tobacco prevention & cessation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women globally. Vietnamese women experience unique challenges, including sociocultural, linguistic, and systemic barriers, contributing to disparities in screening utilization, late-stage diagnoses, and treatment outcomes. Despite advances in early detection and care, inequities persist. A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, with the protocol registered on PROSPERO. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched for original studies published from 2000 to 2024 examining breast cancer screening, outcomes, molecular/genetic features, and disparities in Vietnamese populations. Narrative synthesis was employed due to heterogeneity in study metrics and methodologies. Forty-one studies encompassing 39,324 Vietnamese participants (mean age 48.15 ± 7.48 years) were included. Social networks and acculturation positively influenced screening uptake, while systemic barriers such as language, cultural stigma, and lack of insurance deterred participation. Across included studies, mammography screening rates among Vietnamese women ranged widely from 26% to 83%, consistently lower than the U.S. national average of 81%, and lower than rates reported in many Asian American subgroups. Late-stage diagnoses were prevalent, occurring in 32.9% of Vietnamese women, with foreign-born Vietnamese women exhibiting higher mortality than U.S.-born counterparts. Molecular studies revealed distinct tumor subtypes, including higher HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer rates. Interventions, including culturally tailored education and patient navigator programs, demonstrated success in addressing screening and care disparities. Vietnamese women face significant breast cancer disparities driven by sociocultural, systemic, and biological factors. Effective solutions require integrating culturally tailored solutions to promote equitable outcomes and reduce disparities in breast cancer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.