ArticleMacromolecular bioscience2026
High-Throughput 3D Glioblastoma Model in Glycosaminoglycan Hydrogels for Personalized Therapeutic Screening.
Article in Macromolecular bioscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Co-Culture of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells and fibroblasts induces altered integrin expression associated with 3D structural formation.Cytotechnology · 2026Article
- Focused ultrasound for cellular mechanoactivation and nanomedicine delivery in cancer.Biomedical microdevices · 2026Review
- Standardized Workflow for the Generation of Patient-Derived Glioblastoma Spheroids.Methods and protocols · 2026Article
- High-Throughput 3D Glioblastoma Model in Glycosaminoglycan Hydrogels for Personalized Therapeutic Screening.Macromolecular bioscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is a devastating brain tumor with limited treatment success, partly because in vitro models poorly mimic in vivo complexity. This study introduces a high-throughput 3D culture platform utilizing modular starPEG-glycosaminoglycan (GAG) hydrogels that enable independent control of extracellular matrix (ECM) cues: stiffness, cytokine affinity, matrix metalloproteinase-responsive remodeling, and cell adhesiveness via integrin-binding RGD peptides. This platform supports encapsulation of patient-derived GBM cells, recreates physiologically relevant tumor microenvironments in 384-well plates, and enables automated drug testing on primary cells. Transcriptomic analyses show that 3D cultures recapitulate primary and recurrent GBM programs- including hypoxia-, immune-, and ECM-regulatory pathways driving growth, invasion, and resistance, without externally imposed hypoxia. The platform's versatility extends to drug screening, where single and combinatorial treatments produce reproducible cytoskeletal and transcriptomic responses. Notably, the system revealed dose-dependent reductions in invasive filaments and spheroid architecture with 5-fluorouracil/uridine and carmustine, demonstrating its potential for optimizing combinatorial therapies. This 3D model surpasses 2D cultures, capturing tumor-specific molecular programs and offering a robust tool for translational research. Despite lacking vascular or immune components, its tunability, scalability, and clinical relevance make it a strong basis for advanced co-cultures. By delivering reliable, individualized therapeutic data within a short timeframe, this model holds transformative potential for personalized GBM treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.