ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026
Restoring hand grasping for patients with a complete tetraplegia with selective epineural stimulation: a parsimonious thus relevant clinical approach.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Functional Evaluation of the Recovery of Prehension in Quadriplegics by Implanted Neural Stimulation
Functional Evaluation of the Recovery of Prehension in Persons With Tetraplegia by Implanted Neural Stimulation
Relevance of Virtual Reality Assessment of Control Interfaces for a Neuroprosthesis That Stimulates the Upper Limbs of Quadriplegic Individuals
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe explored epineural stimulation as a parsimonious approach to restore wrist and finger functions in individuals with complete tetraplegia.
methodsTwo epineural multicontact cuff electrodes were implanted in four participants with complete tetraplegia for 28 days. The electrodes were wrapped around two nerves above the elbow, the median nerve and the radial nerve, respectively. The electrodes were connected via percutaneous cables to an external 56-channels electrical stimulator. Electrical stimulation parameters and electrode configurations were empirically adjusted to evoke hand gestures. Voluntary actions by the participant (e.g., muscle contractions, shoulder movements, or button presses) were associated with specific 3D current configurations to enable the triggering of diverse pre-programmed stimulation sequences.
resultsThe electrodes remained in place throughout the entire month, with no technical failure observed. The impedance of the contacts remained stable over time. The activation thresholds of the standard bipolar configuration (so called “Ring”) also demonstrated good stability across sessions. Participants were able to perform at least six functional tasks. P1 and P2 were assigned six preselected tasks—derived from the Motor Capacities Scale (MCS)—while P3 and P4 were given five preselected tasks—two of which were derived from the Motor Capacities Scale (MCS)—as well as five additional self-chosen tasks. An analytical evaluation was applied to the tasks derived from the MCS. The other tasks were graded using a binary outcome: success or failure. Execution times were also analyzed. For P3 and P4, a functional assessment was carried out based on perceived usefulness, usability (System Usability Scale), performance, satisfaction and acceptability with an emphasis on a user-centered approach by the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure.
conclusionsThis article summarizes the observations made during a 1-month follow-up of four participants with complete motor deficit of the wrists and hands who experienced epineural stimulation with the use of electrodes implanted around two arm nerves. This minimalist approach in terms of implanted components enabled them to perform various daily tasks without external assistance. The results—in terms of tolerance, electrode stability and functional success—pave the way for a new neuroprosthetic solution. Trial registration numbers NCT04306328 and NCT05555914.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.