ArticleParasites & vectors2026
Modelling the effects of immigration on the re-introduction of onchocerciasis.
Article in Parasites & vectors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reaching elimination of onchocerciasis transmission with long-term vector control and ivermectin treatment in Togo.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOnchocerciasis is a filarial neglected tropical disease targeted by the World Health Organization for elimination (interruption) of transmission (EOT), principally by mass drug administration (MDA) with ivermectin. Variable effectiveness and success of MDA, among other factors, has led to a markedly heterogeneous contemporary spatial landscape of endemicity and transmission, with some foci having achieved or nearing EOT, while in others, transmission persists despite decades of MDA or has only recently been identified. Communities reaching EOT or free from infection are thus vulnerable to re-introduction of infection imported by immigrants from areas with ongoing transmission.
methodsWe use the stochastic, individual-based EPIONCHO-IBM transmission model to quantify the risk of transmission persistence resulting from importation events and characterise the dynamics of ensuing onchocerciasis outbreaks in terms of microfilarial prevalence (in all ages) and anti-Ov16 seroprevalence (in children aged 5-9 years) in infection-free communities with local populations of black fly vectors.
resultsWe show how the vulnerability of infection-free communities depends on their population size, the local annual biting rate (ABR, number bites/person/year) and the magnitude of importation events, defined by the number of immigrants arriving in the community and their worm burden. We show that small communities with modest ABRs are particularly vulnerable to transmission persistence following importation, with risk exacerbated by the magnitude of infection importation. We illustrate that onchocerciasis outbreak dynamics can be protracted, with seroprevalence in children often taking substantially longer than the currently recommended 3-5 years of post-treatment surveillance (PTS) to exceed 5%.
conclusionsOur findings highlight the vulnerability of infection-free communities to introduction/re-introduction of infection and suggest that proposed PTS durations may need to be extended and complemented with additional surveillance activities and migration studies to detect and respond robustly to nascent outbreaks and sustain elimination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.