Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41535866›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2026

Fostering reflective practice and professional development: implementation of an integrated mentoring and e-portfolio program for medical students.

Sajida Agha, Bakhaitan Alumer, Reem Al-Subait, Nasim Ullah Siddiqui, Syed Waqas Hussain Shah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sajida AghaDepartment of Medical Education, College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. aghasa@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3662-4101
Bakhaitan AlumerDepartment of Family Medicine & Diabetes Management, Armed Forces Hospital Southern Region, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Reem Al-SubaitDepartment of Medical Education, College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nasim Ullah SiddiquiDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Syed Waqas Hussain ShahDepartment of Medical Education, College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective was to evaluate changes in students’ rubric-based competencies and satisfaction over three academic years while examining the use of innovative AI approaches to support integrity in reflective learning. This research paper presents f.

methodsWe employed a longitudinal mixed-methods evaluation over three academic years to assess the College of Medicine newly launched e-portfolio program which was integrated with faculty-led mentorship. All male and female students enrolled in the medicine program in academic year 2021–2022 were included. Detailed manuals were developed, outlining clear objectives, processes, expectations, assessment method, and evaluation guidelines. Mentees submitted reflective documents linked with the general competencies such as self-directed learning, leadership skills, and communication. Reflective documents were reviewed and assessed through formative and summative methods. The primary quantitative endpoint was the summative assessment score of the reflective documents. Feedback about program effectiveness, and implementation challenges were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively.

resultsMentees and faculty appreciated the integrated program. Self-directed learning increased by 36.2% (t = 28.38, p = 0.01; mean difference = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.95–2.24). Professionalism improved by 33.9% (t = 31.30, p = 0.01; mean difference = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.97–2.23). Leadership/organization increased by 38.2% (t = 24.74, p = 0.01; mean difference = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.93–2.23). Many challenges were reported including low student motivation, absence of incentives, plagiarism, and technology issues.

conclusionThe integrated program supports the development of reflective skills and professional growth. The program management should address the identified challenges and continually refine program components.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateMentoringMentorsStudents, MedicalClinical CompetenceCognitive ReflectionFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleProgram EvaluationCompetency-based educationE-portfolioMedical educationMentoringProfessional identityReflective practice

Identifiers

PMID41535866
PMCPMC12888267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.