ArticleBMC medical education2026
Fostering reflective practice and professional development: implementation of an integrated mentoring and e-portfolio program for medical students.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective was to evaluate changes in students’ rubric-based competencies and satisfaction over three academic years while examining the use of innovative AI approaches to support integrity in reflective learning. This research paper presents f.
methodsWe employed a longitudinal mixed-methods evaluation over three academic years to assess the College of Medicine newly launched e-portfolio program which was integrated with faculty-led mentorship. All male and female students enrolled in the medicine program in academic year 2021–2022 were included. Detailed manuals were developed, outlining clear objectives, processes, expectations, assessment method, and evaluation guidelines. Mentees submitted reflective documents linked with the general competencies such as self-directed learning, leadership skills, and communication. Reflective documents were reviewed and assessed through formative and summative methods. The primary quantitative endpoint was the summative assessment score of the reflective documents. Feedback about program effectiveness, and implementation challenges were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively.
resultsMentees and faculty appreciated the integrated program. Self-directed learning increased by 36.2% (t = 28.38, p = 0.01; mean difference = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.95–2.24). Professionalism improved by 33.9% (t = 31.30, p = 0.01; mean difference = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.97–2.23). Leadership/organization increased by 38.2% (t = 24.74, p = 0.01; mean difference = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.93–2.23). Many challenges were reported including low student motivation, absence of incentives, plagiarism, and technology issues.
conclusionThe integrated program supports the development of reflective skills and professional growth. The program management should address the identified challenges and continually refine program components.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.