ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
A longitudinal qualitative study on decision-making and rehabilitation behavior in patients following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe decision-making and rehabilitation journey for patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) is complex and shaped by multifaceted physical and psychological factors, yet a longitudinal understanding of this dynamic process remains limited.
objectiveTo explore the evolving experiences, decision-making processes, and rehabilitation behaviors of patients undergoing ARCR across the pre-operative to post-operative continuum.
methodsA longitudinal qualitative study was conducted using purposive sampling. Between January and June 2025, 15 patients scheduled for ARCR were recruited from two tertiary hospitals in Nantong, China. Semi-structured interviews were conducted at three time points: preoperatively, before discharge, and 30 days postoperatively. Data were analyzed using Smith’s Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA), with synchronous analysis after each interview and longitudinal analysis across all time points upon study completion.
resultsThree primary themes were identified: (1) Navigating the preoperative decision-making dilemma, driven by pain and functional loss, caught between surgical fears and family concerns, and grappling with prognostic uncertainty; (2) Unmanaged symptoms and information gaps undermining recovery foundations, where postoperative pain triggered safety concerns, loss of autonomy caused psychological distress, and ambiguous instructions created confusion; (3) Forging divergent rehabilitation pathways, with some patients building confidence through positive engagement while others developed catastrophic thinking, pain hypersensitivity, or passive coping due to fear and low self-efficacy.
conclusionThe ARCR recovery journey is a dynamic process of psychological and behavioral adaptation, with the immediate postoperative period serving as a critical juncture influencing long-term outcomes. Implementing structured preoperative education, proactive postoperative symptom management, and continuous individualized support is therefore essential to steer patients toward positive rehabilitation behaviors and improve functional recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.