ArticleBMC health services research2026
Discharge time from healthcare facilities after birth in Tanzania : a secondary analysis of demographic and health surveys from 2015 to 16 and 2022.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCare during the immediate postpartum period is critical for women and newborn's health. Following facility-based birth, it is recommended to monitor the health of women and newborns in the facility. In Tanzania, a third of women who give birth in a health facility report not receiving a health check during their stay. Duration of stay and factors influencing them are not well documented in Tanzania. We describe postpartum length-of-stay at two time-points, 2015/2016 and 2022 in Tanzania, and explore factors associated with early discharge.
methodsWe analysed secondary data from two Demographic and Health Surveys: n = 3,582 women from 2015 to 16 and n = 4,618 from 2022 who had a livebirth in a health facility during the three years preceding the survey. Early discharge was defined as discharge < 24 h after vaginal birth and < 72 h after a caesarean birth. We describe the percentage of early discharge at both DHS time-points and explore factors associated with it using 2022 data with multivariable logistic regression, separately by mode of birth.
resultsAlmost half of women who had a vaginal birth were discharged early in 2015-16, compared to 30.3% in 2022. Early discharge increased among women who had a caesarean section from 17.2% in 2015-16 to 25.2% in 2022. The odds of early discharge were higher in Zanzibar compared to Eastern zone, and factors associated with early discharge included level of facility, frequency of antenatal care visits, maternal education and newborn underweight status.
conclusionsDespite progress in reducing early postpartum discharge after vaginal births, it continued to affect a third of women giving birth in Tanzania in 2022. Disparities between regions and facility levels suggest potential inconsistencies in the application of postpartum guidelines, warranting the need to determine and address the underlying causes, standardise practice and ensure equitable access to quality postpartum care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.