Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41535801›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2026

Feasibility and preliminary effects of non-immersive virtual reality motor-cognitive treadmill training in older Veterans: a single-arm pilot study.

Susan S Conroy, Alyssa Stookey, Brock A Beamer, John D Sorkin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Susan S ConroyBaltimore VA Medical Center Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Health Administration, Baltimore, MD, USA. susan.conroy@va.gov.
Alyssa StookeyBaltimore VA Medical Center Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Health Administration, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Brock A BeamerBaltimore VA Medical Center Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Health Administration, Baltimore, MD, USA.
John D SorkinBaltimore VA Medical Center Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Health Administration, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

University of Maryland Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center (UM-OAIC)P30AG028747 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI ALICE S. RYAN · 2006 to 2026
$28.9M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDaily life involves the successful completion of dual task walking activities and is a dynamic integration of motor and cognitive skills to meet environmental and postural demands to avoid a fall. Older Veterans face greater cognitive decline risk, greater comorbidities, and poorer health than non-veterans and have a higher age-related fall risk. Non-immersive VR motor-cognitive treadmill (VR-TM) training can improve balance, walking, and fall risk in older adults but has not been studied in older Veterans and has been largely studied in neurological populations. This pilot study proposed to investigate the acceptance and feasibility of using VR-TM among older Veterans with a history of falls or documented fall risk. METHODOLOGY: Thirty community-dwelling older Veterans aged 65-to-88 years (26 male, 4 female) consented and twenty-three completed this single-arm pilot study. Participants received 14 treatment sessions over 7-weeks using a VR-TM system to walk over virtual obstacles on a treadmill. Balance performance, walking endurance, quality of life (QOL), fear of falling and balance confidence were assessed pre- and post-training. A satisfaction survey was conducted post-training. Descriptive statistics examined fall incidence prior to training and over a six-month retention. Paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-ranked test performed on the twenty-three completers examined longitudinal change at significance level P = 0.05.

resultsThe Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) had a statistically significant change (20.9 ± 4.20; 23.13 ± 3.03; P = 0.01) and six participants had a 4-point improvement reflective of a minimal clinically important difference (MCID). The Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale improved post-training (65.18 ± 21.68; 73.04 ± 18.40; P = 0.02) and four participants had a > 18% (MCID) confidence gain. VR-TM training was a feasible intervention in this population and twenty-three out of the thirty consented Veterans (76.6%) completed the protocol. Ninety-four percent of these completers would recommend the VR-TM training to a friend. No significant change was seen in walking performance, walking endurance, QOL outcomes or fall incidence.

conclusionsThe VR-TM training was well accepted and feasible in a small heterogenous cohort of older Veterans with complex comorbidities. Larger randomized trials will be needed to confirm its benefits to balance performance, dual task ability and fall prevention.

trial registrationThis small, non-randomized, non-blinded single-arm feasibility pilot with restricted enrollment to patients at a single medical center was not posted to ClinicalTrials.gov.

Indexed as

Exercise TestExercise TherapyVeteransVirtual RealityWalkingAccidental FallsAgedAged, 80 and overCognitive TrainingDual-Task TestsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsPostural BalanceAgeingBalanceDual-task trainingFall preventionFallsNon-immersive virtual realityVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID41535801
PMCPMC12888129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.