ArticleBMC oral health2026
Finite element study on the effect of bruxism on the fracture resistance of maxillary zirconia fixed partial dentures with varying anterior inter-implant distances.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to investigate the effect of bruxism on the fracture resistance of maxillary zirconia fixed denture prostheses (FDP) with different inter-implant distances and different occlusion types.
methodsWe developed four finite element models that reflect maxillary fixed dental prostheses in patients with bruxism. The original version retains the prosthesis using six implants positioned at the canines, premolars, and first molars. The second one features implants positioned at the lateral incisors, canines, and second premolars. The development of two supplementary models, 3 and 4, included a reduction of the cusp height by 0.35 mm. Angle's classification, encompassing classes I, II, and III, directs the application of pressures to all models subjected to parafunctional habits, including bruxism.
resultsModel 1 exhibited the lowest values for FDP and bone deformation, measuring 77 μm and 27 μm, respectively. Model 3 followed with values ranging from 71 to 73 μm for FDP and 25 to 26 μm for bone deformation. In contrast, Models 2 and 4 demonstrated higher values, with Model 2 showing particularly elevated measurements of 104 μm for FDP and 43 μm for bone deformation. In Models 2 and 3, the Von Mises stress in the FDP was less than 500 MPa, suggesting a less risk of fatigue, whereas Models 1 and 4 surpassed this threshold. Models 1 and 3 exhibited physiological bone stress, whereas Models 2 and 4 demonstrated unsafe levels indicative of potential structural damage. Class I and II occlusions exhibited stable, low-stress profiles, while Class III occlusions resulted in increased shear and torque due to anterior occlusal displacement. This underscores the importance of occlusion-specific prosthetic design to mitigate peri-implant stress.
conclusionsThe distribution of implants in Models 1 and 3 may enhance stability and extend longevity. A 350-micron reduction in occlusal surface height was associated with reduced stress and deformation in the models, which may enhance the lifespan of the FDPs. Therefore, reducing the occlusal surface height of FDP is recommended for patients with bruxism. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: It is recommended that clinicians construct maxillary zirconia FDPs with a broader implant distribution and a cusp inclination of (≤ 15º) for better outcomes in patients with bruxism. This configuration enhances prosthetic stability and reduces stress, thereby increasing longevity. Clinical protocols may encompass strategic implant placement, reduction of cusp height, and individualized occlusal design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.