ArticleBMC genomics2026
Comparative analysis of PRR receptors and R genes reveals structural and functional divergence between wild, ancestral, and commercial citrus species.
Article in BMC genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCitriculture holds significant socioeconomic importance but is adversely affected by diseases that reduce productivity. Plant disease resistance is typically relies on efficient defense mechanisms - PTI and ETI - involving PRR receptors and R genes responsible for pathogen recognition and the initiation of defense responses.
resultsIn silico analyses performed on 11 genomes of 10 Citrus species, as well one genome of each Poncirus trifoliata and Fortunella hindsii, enabled the identification and classification of PRR receptors and R genes, analysis of gene duplication and clusters, validation of findings using RNA-seq libraries, and assessment of inter- and intraspecific variability across 43 additional accessions.
conclusionsOur results show that PRR receptors and genes are organized in clusters and exhibit both inter- and intraspecific diversity, with wild citrus species presenting lower gene counts compared to ancestral and hybrid species. Wild species showed a predominance of membrane-associated PRRs (RLKs and RLPs), potentially linked to early pathogen recognition, whereas ancestral and hybrid species exhibited higher abundance of intracellular receptors (CNL and TNL). These patterns suggest distinct immune strategies among citrus species, although further functional studies are required to confirm their roles in PTI or ETI responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.