ArticleScientific reports2026
Functional competency of a novel 2-ply vacuum-pressed biological scaffold for entire posterior mitral valve reconstruction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study assessed the feasibility of posterior mitral valve leaflet and subvalvular reconstruction in an acute porcine model using a novel 2-ply vacuum-pressed small intestinal submucosal extracellular matrix (SIS-ECM) patch. Reconstruction was performed in an acute 80-kg porcine model (n = 7), using a novel 2-ply vacuum-pressed SIS-ECM (CorMatrix) patch for posterior mitral reconstruction. Echocardiography and left ventricular pressure were assessed pre- and post-interventional. Sonomicrometry was used to evaluate the geometry and valve dynamics. The reconstructed mitral valves were all fully competent. The peak left atrial pressure at baseline and post-reconstruction was 9.9 (1.1) vs 9.9 (1.0) mmHg, p = 0.676, diff = 0.002 mmHg, 95% CI: [-1.06;1.05], and the mean trans-mitral pressure difference was 4.5 (2.3) vs 4.1 (2.3) mmHg, p = 0.063, diff = -0.40, 95% CI: [-2,73;1.93] The out-of-plane characteristics and subvalvular geometry of the mitral valve were preserved after reconstruction. Slight atrial bending of the reconstructed posterior leaflet and systolic annular ballooning were observed. In an acute porcine model, we successfully reconstructed the posterior mitral valve and subvalvular apparatus using our modified 2-ply vacuum-pressed SIS-ECM patch. The bioscaffold demonstrated short-term durability in vivo, warranting further investigation of its long-term durability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.