ArticleScientific reports2026
An explainable real time sensor graph transformer for dance recognition.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The automatic interpretation of dance motion sequences from inertial and pressure-based sensors requires models that maintain strict temporal fidelity, preserve orientation invariance, and produce verifiable reasoning suitable for real-time deployment on constrained hardware. Existing approaches frequently lose accuracy when confronted with heterogeneous choreography, variable sensor placement, or shifting performer-specific kinematics, and they offer limited access to the decision-relevant evidence that underlies their classifications. This study introduces an explainable sensor-driven dance recognition framework constructed around an Adaptive Sensor Normalisation module that performs quaternion-based orientation correction with drift-aware Kalman refinement, a Multi-Scale Motion Feature Extractor that applies tempo-conditioned dilation schedules to capture micro-step transitions and phrase-level rhythmic structures, and a Spatio-Temporal Graph Attention Core that integrates edge-weighted graph convolutions with dual spatial-temporal attention to quantify sensor saliency and temporal concentration. A final Explainable Decision and Feedback Layer links prototype-anchored latent representations with gradient-resolved saliency vectors to expose class-specific motion determinants. The system is optimized for edge-class execution through kernel-level compression and causal attention windows operating on a 512-sample sliding segment. Experiments on three inertial datasets indicate classification accuracy up to 94.2 percent, movement-quality estimation of 92.8 percent, and sub-8.5 millisecond per-frame latency that confirms stability under tempo variation, sensor drift, and partial channel loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.