Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41535677›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

The influence of individual characteristics on children's learning with a social robot versus a human.

Allison Langer, Jason R Wilson, Lauren Howard, Peter J Marshall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Allison LangerTemple University, Philadelphia, USA. allison.langer@temple.edu.
Jason R WilsonFranklin & Marshall College, Lancaster, USA.
Lauren HowardFranklin & Marshall College, Lancaster, USA.
Peter J MarshallTemple University, Philadelphia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of child-robot interaction (CRI) is growing rapidly, in part due to demand to provide sustained, personalized support for children in educational contexts. The present study uses a within-subject design to compare how children between 5 and 8 years of age (n=32) interact with a robot and human instructor during a tangram learning task. To assess how the children's characteristics may influence their behaviors with the instructors, we correlated interaction metrics, such as eye gaze, social referencing, and vocalizations, with parent-reported scales of children's temperament, social skills, and prior technology exposure. We found that children gazed more at the robot instructor and had more instances of social referencing toward a research assistant in the room while interacting with the robot. Age was related to task time completion, but few other individual characteristics were related to behavioral characteristics with the human and robot instructors. When asked about preferences and perceptions of the instructors after completing the tangram tasks, children showed a strong preference for interacting with the robot. These findings have implications for the integration of social technologies into educational contexts and suggest individual differences play a key role in understanding how children will uniquely respond to robots.

Indexed as

LearningRoboticsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansIndividualityMaleSocial BehaviorSocial Skills

Identifiers

PMID41535677
PMCPMC12848055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.