Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41535640›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026

The representational nature of action-effect relations: A memory process dissociation approach.

Marcel R Schreiner, Wilfried Kunde

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marcel R SchreinerDepartment of Psychology III, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Röntgenring 11, Würzburg, 97070, Germany. marcel.schreiner@uni-wuerzburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7719-6281
Wilfried KundeDepartment of Psychology III, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Röntgenring 11, Würzburg, 97070, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6256-8011

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Learning how actions change the environment is crucial for goal-directed actions and skill acquisition. Here, we applied a process dissociation approach to investigate the contribution of explicit and implicit memory to the learning of action-effect relations across four experiments. Participants produced object images by pressing one of two keys, with each action-effect episode experienced three times. Learning was either incidental (Experiments 1-2) or intentional (Experiments 2-4) and occurred under full (Experiments 1-4) or divided (Experiments 3-4) attention. In a test phase, participants were re-presented the effect images and asked to either reproduce or alternate the action that had produced them. Results obtained through cognitive modeling revealed that action-effect relations are primarily represented in explicit memory, with minimal contributions of implicit memory. Intentional learning enhanced memory compared to incidental learning, while divided attention during encoding reduced it, with these factors mainly affecting explicit memory. These findings elucidate the mechanisms underlying skill acquisition and provide insights into the representational nature of action-effect relations.

Indexed as

AttentionIntentionLearningMemoryPsychomotor PerformanceAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultAction controlAction–effect learningCognitive modelingExplicit memoryImplicit memoryProcess dissociation

Identifiers

PMID41535640
PMCPMC12804304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.