ReviewAnnals of hematology2026
The evolving landscape of platelet therapy: risks, innovations, and clinical judgment.
Review in Annals of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and Safety of Romiplostim Versus Placebo in Immune Thrombocytopenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisPooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Platelet transfusion is a cornerstone of modern supportive care, yet its application is characterized by significant practice variation and uncertainty regarding optimal strategies. This comprehensive review synthesizes current evidence to delineate a more nuanced, physiologically informed approach to platelet therapy. A paradigm shift is underway, moving from uniform count-based triggers toward more restrictive, evidence-based practices; this includes prophylactic thresholds of < 10 × 10⁹/L in stable hematology-oncology patients and therapeutic-only strategies in select populations. In massive hemorrhage, fixed-ratio resuscitation protocols incorporating early platelet administration are critical for improving hemostasis. Conversely, high-quality evidence now defines populations where transfusion may be harmful, including in thrombotic microangiopathies like TTP, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in patients on antiplatelet agents. The utility of viscoelastic assays in guiding goal-directed therapy and the potential of novel products such as pathogen-reduced, cold-stored, and cryopreserved platelets to mitigate the limitations of conventional storage are also critically examined. This review provides clinicians with a framework to navigate these complexities, emphasizing a context-dependent strategy that balances hemostatic benefit against potential harm to optimize patient outcomes and steward a precious resource.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.