Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41535610›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of hematology2026

Ponatinib for CML patients in routine clinical practice: the PONDEROSA study.

Thomas Schenk, Christian Fabisch, Thomas Ernst, Philipp Ernst, Susanne Saussele, Daniela Žáčková, Jiří Mayer, Hana Klamová, Andreas Hochhaus, German CML Study Group and the Czech Leukemia Study Group

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Thomas SchenkAbteilung Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany. thomas.schenk@med.uni-jena.de.
Christian FabischAbteilung Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany.
Thomas ErnstAbteilung Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany.
Philipp ErnstAbteilung Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany.
Susanne SausseleMedizinische Klinik III, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Daniela ŽáčkováDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno and Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Jiří MayerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno and Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Hana KlamováInstitute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, Praha, Czech Republic.
Andreas HochhausAbteilung Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany.
German CML Study Group and the Czech Leukemia Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ponatinib, a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is effective in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), particularly in cases of resistance or BCR::ABL1 T315I mutation. However, arterial occlusive events (AOEs) remain an important safety concern. The PONDEROSA registry evaluated ponatinib use under routine clinical conditions in Germany and the Czech Republic. This observational cohort study included 99 adult CML patients treated with ponatinib; patient recruitment took place between 2015 and 2022 at 31 centers. The median follow-up was 22 months (range: 1-83). Among the 99 patients (median age 54 years at CML diagnosis), 91.9% were in chronic phase, 4.0% in accelerated phase, and 4.0% in blast phase. The T315I BCR::ABL1 mutation was detected in 19.2%. Ponatinib starting doses were 45 mg/day (32.3%), 30 mg/day (37.3%), or 15 mg/day (29.3%). Adverse events (AEs) were recorded in 64.6% of patients. Severe cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events occurred in 12.1% of patients, with no fatal events observed. Ponatinib was discontinued in 31.3% of patients, mainly due to intolerance or lack of response. 58.6% of patients achieved or maintained at least a major molecular response (MMR), compared to 19.0% at baseline. Disease progression was observed in 14.1% of patients, and 8.1% underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The estimated 2-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 84.4% and 85.7%, respectively. The PONDEROSA study confirms the clinical effectiveness of ponatinib in routine practice. Individualized dosing strategies are essential to balance efficacy and cardiovascular safety. Ponatinib remains a valuable bridging therapy for patients requiring allogeneic transplantation.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsImidazolesLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyridazinesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesCzech RepublicFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFusion Proteins, bcr-ablGermanyHumansMaleAntineoplastic AgentsFusion Proteins, bcr-ablImidazolesponatinibProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyridazinesArterial occlusive eventsChronic myeloid leukemiaDose optimizationPonatinibReal-world evidenceRegistry

Identifiers

PMID41535610
PMCPMC12804319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.