ArticleScientific reports2026
Novel DCAT plans in stereotactic body radiotherapy for stage I/II centrally located non-small-cell lung cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluated the feasibility of a novel dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT) plan, based on segment shape optimization (SSO) and variable dose rate (VDR), versus volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in stage I/II centrally located non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) per RTOG 0813. Twenty-five patients with PTV < 70 cc were retrospectively analyzed, with both plans using identical parameters in Monaco. Both plans met RTOG 0813 criteria. DCAT showed increased ipsilateral and total lung dose but no significant differences in most other organs at risk (OARs) (P > 0.05). DCAT significantly reduced segments (median 19.38%), monitor units (MUs, median 23.27%), and beam-on time (BOT, median 8.80 s; P < 0.05). Its γ passing rate (2%, 1 mm) was higher (93.70% vs. VMAT 91.90%, P < 0.05). Larger PTV volumes improved DCAT's heterogeneity index (HI) and segment advantages but worsened R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.