ArticleScientific reports2026
Effects of microplastic on submerged nanofiltration for advanced drinking water treatment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The removal of organic matter from drinking water is critical for protecting public health. However, their removal by an emerging process, submerged nanofiltration (NF), can be affected by competing substances, such as microplastics (MPs). This study aimed to investigate the impact of MPs in reservoir water on the removal of dissolved organic matter (DOM) using a submerged NF membrane. In the experiments, a loose NF membrane (NF270) was operated at a pressure below 0.1 MPa. Polyethylene terephthalate microplastics (PET-MPs) were introduced into the feed water at concentrations of 0, 10, 100, and 1,000 mg/L for filtration cycles 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The results showed that the permeate flux did not significantly differ across all cycles, ranging between 12.7 and 14.7 L/m²·h. Increasing PET-MP concentrations adversely affected DOM removal efficiency, which was analyzed in terms of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and ultraviolet absorbance at 254 nm (surrogate indicator of humic acid concentrations). Specifically, as the PET-MP concentration increased from 0 to 1,000 mg/L, the DOC removal decreased from 87.9% to 86.6%, and the UV-254 absorbance removal decreased from 97.5% to 90.0%. This study demonstrated that the submerged NF270 membrane effectively removed DOM via a size exclusion phenomenon. Humic acid promoted electrostatic repulsion and encouraged ion retention by increasing the negative electrical charge on the membrane. In contrast, water molecules, which are small and nearly uncharged, can permeate fouled membranes more readily than organic molecules. However, the removal efficiency decreased with increasing PET-MP concentration. Sponge cleaning reduced membrane surface fouling, as indicated by the stable permeate flux. Overall, this study demonstrated that submerged NF treatment can be stably operated without the effects of MPs on membrane fouling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.