ArticleScientific reports2026
Optimizing sepsis mortality prediction using hybrid federated learning and explainable AI framework.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk factors for sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence-assisted phenotyping of sepsis: Research progress, clinical challenges, and translational prospects.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sepsis is a life-threatening condition resulting from a dysregulated host response to infection, frequently leading to organ failure and high mortality in hospital settings. Early identification of sepsis is critical for reducing mortality; however, conventional diagnostic approaches often fail to capture complex clinical patterns at an early stage. Recent advances in machine learning (ML) and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) have demonstrated potential for improving predictive accuracy while supporting clinical interpretability. Nevertheless, concerns related to data privacy and model transparency continue to limit real-world clinical adoption. To address these challenges, this study proposes a hybrid framework that integrates federated learning with ensemble-based machine learning models and explainable AI techniques for sepsis mortality prediction. The framework employs Random Forest, LightGBM, XGBoost, K-Nearest Neighbors, and Logistic Regression models, trained in a decentralized manner to preserve patient data privacy. Model interpretability is enhanced using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME), and Partial Dependence Plots (PDP), enabling transparent and clinician-oriented decision support. The proposed framework is evaluated using standard performance metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC–AUC), in both centralized and federated settings. Experimental results demonstrate that ensemble models, particularly Random Forest and gradient boosting methods, achieve high predictive performance while maintaining robustness in a federated environment. The findings indicate that combining FL with XAI enables accurate, privacy-preserving, and interpretable sepsis mortality prediction, supporting reliable clinical decision-making and potential deployment in real-time intensive care unit applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.