ArticleScientific reports2026
Psychological outcomes and resilience among evacuees and non-evacuees following the October 7 Hamas attack in Israel.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nation under pressure: examining widespread trauma exposure and resilience in Israel.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The October 7th, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel's southern territory marked one of the most devastating events in the nation's history, and the ensuing war with Hamas in the south and Hezbollah in the north resulted in the internal displacement of more than a quarter million Israelis. In the current study we examined the impact of these traumatic events on 636 Israeli Jewish evacuees (n = 300) and non-evacuees (n = 336), focusing on the differential effects of personal resilience, community resilience, and trust in formal authorities on post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) and life functioning. The findings revealed that 38.7% of participants met the criteria for PTSD, to a greater extent among the evacuees (45.7%) than the non-evacuees (32.4%). Evacuees experienced higher levels of trauma exposure and PTSS and lower life functioning and trust in authorities than did non-evacuees. No significant differences were found between the groups in personal or community resilience. Regression analyses indicated that higher exposure was a predictor of more PTSS and lower functioning, whereas personal resilience was negatively associated with PTSS and positively associated with functioning. Community resilience and trust were positively associated with life functioning. The study highlights the importance of resilience and trust in mitigating the adverse effects of trauma, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions to support evacuated populations. These findings contribute to the broader understanding of the psychological impact of terrorism and provide insights into strategies for fostering resilience and recovery in the aftermath of national crises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.