Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41535378›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026

Understanding nutrition challenges and information needs of women undergoing cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer: a study protocol for an experience-based co-design methodology.

Kathryn Cherry, Emma Quigley, Cherry Koh, Aisling Scully, Rhonda Farrell, Adrienne Young, Margaret Allman-Farinelli, Sharon Carey

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kathryn CherryFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. kche0788@uni.sydney.edu.au.
Emma QuigleyConsumer Representative, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Cherry KohInstitute of Academic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Aisling ScullyNutrition and Dietetics Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Rhonda FarrellChris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Adrienne YoungDietetics and Food Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Margaret Allman-FarinelliFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Sharon CareyNutrition and Dietetics Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCytoreductive surgery (CRS) with or without intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a complex surgery aimed at removing peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM). PSM is prevalent in ovarian cancer, with up to 85% of patients experiencing non-specific symptoms leading to malnutrition. Studies have shown oncology patients display confusion about nutrition recommendations, although understudied in ovarian cancer. Experience-based co-design is a method of participatory research with key principles including empowerment and collaboration. This project aims to utilise experience-based co-design to understand nutrition challenges and develop nutrition resources for women undergoing CRS ± HIPEC for ovarian cancer. The secondary aim is to evaluate the experience-based co-design process to ensure it aligns with key principles of co-design.

methodsThis multi-centre study utilises experience-based co-design. Using maximum variation sampling, women with lived experience of CRS ± HIPEC for ovarian cancer, along with experienced oncology healthcare professionals will be invited to participate. Participants will be interviewed to identify key nutrition issues and information needs. Using thematic analysis, a patient journey map will be developed and key themes identified. A feedback session will be held for participants to identify priorities for service improvement and patient resource development based on key issues identified by patient journey mapping. These priorities will be addressed in co-design workshops with participants with lived experience and clinicians to develop patient information resources. Resources and experience-based co-design processes will be evaluated at the completion of the workshops.

conclusionsThis study will deliver new insights into the nutrition challenges and information needs identified by people undergoing CRS ± HIPEC for ovarian cancer within a co-design approach.

Indexed as

Cytoreduction Surgical ProceduresMalnutritionOvarian NeoplasmsFemaleHumansHyperthermia, InducedHyperthermic Intraperitoneal ChemotherapyNutritional StatusPatient Education as TopicPeritoneal NeoplasmsResearch DesignCo-designMalnutritionOvarian cancerPatient involvementSurgerySurgical menopause

Identifiers

PMID41535378
PMCPMC12804214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.