Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41535366›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Energy and makespan optimised task mapping in fog enabled IoT application: a hybrid approach.

Niva Tripathy, Sampa Sahoo, Norah Saleh Alghamdi, Wattana Viriyasitavat, Gaurav Dhiman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Niva TripathyDepartment of CSE, C.V. Raman Global University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Sampa SahooDepartment of CSE, C.V. Raman Global University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Norah Saleh AlghamdiDepartment of Computer Sciences, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Wattana ViriyasitavatBusiness Information Technology Division, Department of Statistics, Faculty of Commerce and Accountancy, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Gaurav DhimanDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Yuan Ze University, Tao Yuan, Taiwan. gdhiman0001@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) points to billions of connected devices that share data through the Internet. However, the increasing volume of data generated by IoT devices makes remote cloud data centers inefficient for delay-sensitive applications. In this regard, fog computing, which brings computation closer to the data source, plays a significant role in addressing the above issue. However, resource constraints in fog computing demand an effective task-scheduling technique to handle the enormous volume of data. Many researchers have proposed a variety of heuristic and meta-heuristic approaches for effective scheduling; however, there is still scope for improvement. In this paper, we propose EMAPSO (energy makespan-aware PSO). The simultaneous minimization of makespan and energy is presented as a bi-objective optimization problem. The approach also considered the load-balancing factor while assigning a task to a VM in a fog/cloud environment. The proposed algorithm, EMAPSO, is compared to standard PSO, Modified PSO (MPSO), Bird swarm optimization (BSO), and the Bee Life Algorithm (BLA). The experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms the compared algorithms in terms of resource utilization, makespan, and energy consumption.

Indexed as

Energy consumptionLoad balancingMakespanPSOTask offloading

Identifiers

PMID41535366
PMCPMC12880970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.