ArticleScientific reports2026
Dynamic causal weighting-based risk propagation modeling for airport movement areas.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To analyze how dynamic operational conditions (e.g., environment changes, traffic surges) drive risk propagation in airport movement areas, this study proposes a model integrating complex network theory and reinforcement learning to decode causal relationships from historical incidents. We construct a risk propagation network and leverage causal convolutional reinforcement learning (CCRL) to dynamically quantify inter-node causal strength through temporal pattern mining. First, an enhanced grey relational model (with standardized discrimination coefficients) identifies 63 critical risk factors from multi-source data, addressing extremum-induced distortion in traditional methods. Second, a capacity-load propagation framework classifies nodes into impedance/cumulative types for heterogeneous risk modeling. Third, the CCRL framework facilitates dynamic adjustment of propagation weights through continuous updates of time-varying causal strengths. Experimental results show that our model outperforms Dynamic Bayesian Networks (DBN) by 4.1% in prediction accuracy under data scarcity (n = 1067 incidents) and strong time-varying conditions. The model objectively identifies 63 critical risk factors and enables targeted control strategies that reduce risk diffusion indices by 20%, providing a novel and effective approach for deconstructing time-varying risk propagation in airport movement areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.