ArticleScientific reports2026
Co-creating micro-scale nature-based designs in Tshwane, South Africa: balancing stakeholder interests in the design process.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Urban sustainability in the global south.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rapid urbanization and climate adaptation pressures have escalated the need for co-created nature-based design solutions to address infrastructure challenges in urban green spaces. Yet, how diverse, cross-sectoral stakeholder expectations are navigated in these processes remains underexplored. This study investigates the feasibility of integrating co-creation into conventional landscape design practices, highlighting the associated stakeholder interests. The study took place in a South African marginalized peri-urban community and employed a multi-method approach including site surveys, focus group discussions, informal conversations, and co-design workshops. Our findings suggest that co-creation involves ascertaining buy-in from all stakeholders through a shared vision, inspiring capacity strengthening and empowerment, valuing knowledge exchange and reciprocal learning, identifying champions and bridging agents, and building bonds and maintaining trust. In co-creation, the designer becomes a facilitator rather than a creator, who must manage an extended co-design process that becomes part of the overall output. The feasibility of this process depends on managing degrees of co-creation through time, balancing desired outcomes between stakeholders, and focusing on dedicated engagement. Despite challenges, co-creating micro-scale nature-based designs can be used as a method of contextual inquiry and show potential to foster social inclusivity, reciprocal learning, and sustainable urban green space transformation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.