ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Multicenter evaluation of interpretable AI for coronary artery disease diagnosis from PET biomarkers.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Virtual myocardial blood flow and flow reserve from static PET imaging using artificial intelligence.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) for myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) provides multiple imaging biomarkers, often evaluated separately. We developed an artificial intelligence (AI) model integrating key clinical PET MPI parameters to improve the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). From 17,348 patients undergoing cardiac PET/CT across four sites, 1664 with invasive coronary angiography and no prior CAD were retrospectively analyzed. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores were derived from CT attenuation correction maps, and XGBoost model was trained on one site using 10 image-derived parameters: CAC, stress/rest left ventricular ejection fraction, stress myocardial blood flow (MBF), myocardial flow reserve (MFR), ischemic and stress total perfusion deficit (TPD), transient ischemic dilation ratio, rate pressure product, and sex. External validation was performed across three independent sites. In the testing cohort (n = 1278; CAD prevalence 53%), the AI model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.81-0.85), outperforming experienced physicians (0.80, p = 0.02) and individual biomarkers such as ischemic TPD (0.79, p < 0.001) and MFR (0.75, p < 0.001). Performance was consistent across sex, body mass index, and age. AI integrating perfusion, flow, and CAC scoring improves PET MPI diagnostic accuracy, offering automated and interpretable predictions for CAD diagnosis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.