ArticleScientific reports2026
Perception of online learning, knowledge assessment, and clinical skills among third-year ophthalmology residents studying during the COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Given the high predicted probability of future pandemics, it is essentially important that we understand the benefits and drawbacks of online learning compared to traditional in-class learning-especially in specialized education like healthcare-related educational settings. This is the first study to investigate the first-person perception of online learning, knowledge assessment, and longitudinal confidence in clinical skills among third-year ophthalmology residents studying during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand. This survey-based study enrolled all 74 ophthalmologists that graduated in 2020 from Thailand's eleven accredited ophthalmology training centers. The results of this study revealed general acceptance and approval of online learning in a pandemic setting that prevented traditional in-class learning. Respondents overwhelmingly endorsed online knowledge examination/assessment and their trust in an honor system among online examinees; however, they at the same time strongly stressed the need for controls to improve the prevention of cheating during online testing. Regarding study ophthalmologist confidence in performing ophthalmologic procedures and surgeries compared between immediately after graduation from ophthalmology training and at one year after graduation, the results indicate that, despite the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, most study ophthalmologists had and maintained a relatively high level of confidence in performing various ophthalmic procedures and surgeries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.