ArticleScientific reports2026
Sustainable removal of azo dyes from real effluents using a biomass-derived composite.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The bio-adsorptive treatment of detergent: performance and mechanisms.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Congo Red-Functionalized Maize Stalk for FePolymers · 2026Article
- Adsorption-Based Mitigation of Azo Dye Toxicity: Removal of Direct Red 23 Using Amberlite XAD-4 Resin.Toxics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, the composite of Seaweed as biomass and Anthracite @ Chitosan (MS-An@Cs) was successfully prepared for the removal of methyl orange as one of toxic azo dye from real and aqueous solutions. The physicochemical characteristics were investigated using X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and thermogravimetric analysis. The effects of contact time, pH, adsorbent mass, agitation rate, initial dye concentration, and temperature were assessed through batch adsorption experiments, which revealed that the monolayer coverage was 38.2 mg/g. Moreover, several intervening diffusion types, such as intra-particle diffusion, were associated with the regulating phase in the MO sorption process. The MO equilibrium data was also examined using the linear versions of the Freundlich, DR, and Langmuir isotherms; the results indicated that the Langmuir fit the data best, with an R2 value of 0.92. Mo sorption kinetics onto MS-An@Cs were described by a pseudo-second-order model, and the linear and nonlinear regression analyses’ results matched well (R2 > 0. 0.965). It was proven by the thermodynamic parameters ΔH°, ΔS°, and ΔG° that the MO sorption process at 288–328 K was spontaneous and endothermic.the removal percentage of MO from real sample reached 97.5%. It was shown that the composite could be recycled at least six times after its recyclability and regeneration were examined. Additionally, adsorption kinetics and thermodynamics were examined. The created composite is therefore thought to be a more effective adsorbent that can effectively and economically treat industrial wastewater in Egypt. Batch scale-up studies reveal that just 53.72 g of the MS-An@Cs nanocomposite can effectively remove 95% of MO dye from 50 L of contaminated water at the tested concentration, while cost analysis estimates a low production cost of $0.0174 per gram, demonstrating its superior cost efficiency over conventional water purification methods reported in prior this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.