Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41535315›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Balance and imbalance in dark and bright (OFF and ON) visual channels.

Ernest Greene, Jack Morrison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ernest GreenePsychophysics Research Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. egreene@usc.edu.
Jack MorrisonPsychophysics Research Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

Neuropsychology Foundation 00000Quest for Truth Foundation 00000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The visual system uses separate neuron channels to distinguish figures that are darker or brighter than their background. We displayed letters as dark and/or bright pulses, with pulse energy scaled as a function of background energy, and assessed the probability of letter recognition as a function of pulse energy and polarity. Similarity of effect for dark and bright pulses was tested with single pulses and with flicker displays. The role of frequency and polarity within flicker cycles was evaluated with reference to provisions of the Talbot-Plateau law. Some energy ranges of dark and bright energy produced comparable changes in the probability of letter recognition, while others did not. The results also provide insight into what stimulus conditions will produce a previously reported “anomalous contrast” effect.

Indexed as

Contrast polarity OFF & ON channels Talbot-Plateau anomalous contrast

Identifiers

PMID41535315
PMCPMC12804859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.