ArticleThe Medical journal of Australia2026
Health Impairment Notifications About Doctors to the Australian Medical Regulator, 2012-2022: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in The Medical journal of Australia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Health Impairment Notifications About Doctors to the Australian Medical Regulator, 2012-2022: A Retrospective Cohort Study.The Medical journal of Australia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the prevalence, characteristics and outcomes of health impairment notifications to the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (Ahpra) and to assess the influence of doctor age, sex, specialty, practice location and country of training on the incidence of health impairment notifications. STUDY
designRetrospective cohort study; analysis of linked de-identified Ahpra medical register and health impairment notifications data. SETTING,
participantsAll doctors registered to practise in Australia (except New South Wales) for whom notifications of concerns about physical or mental illness, cognitive decline, substance use disorder or other impairment to safely practising medicine were received by Ahpra during 1 July 2012-30 June 2022.
main outcome measuresHealth impairment notifications, overall and by notification type and specialty; influence of doctors' characteristics on the incidence of notifications.
resultsDuring 2012-2022, 112,677 doctors were registered to practise in Australia (other than New South Wales). A total of 1732 health impairment notifications were recorded, including at least one notification for 1258 doctors (1.1%). In multivariable analyses, the incidence of health impairment notifications was higher for male than female doctors (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR], 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-1.67), for doctors aged 70 years or older than for those aged 30-39 years (aIRR, 2.92; 95% CI, 2.30-3.70) and for doctors in regional (aIRR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.12-1.58), rural (aIRR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.03-1.57) and remote areas (aIRR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.03-2.33) than in metropolitan areas. Among doctors with specialist qualifications, the incidence of notifications was higher for psychiatrists than internal medicine physicians (aIRR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.62-3.21) and the incidence of substance use notifications was highest for anaesthetists (vs. internal medicine physicians: aIRR, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.66-4.83). Compared with doctors who trained in Australia, doctors who trained in non-comparable jurisdictions were less likely to be subjects of health impairment notifications (aIRR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.43-0.64). Of 1708 notifications with final Ahpra determinations, 367 (21.5%) resulted in practice restrictions or removal from practice.
conclusionsHealth impairment notifications are infrequent but can have serious consequences for doctors. The incidence of health impairment notifications is influenced by doctor age, sex, specialty and location. Specific measures that take these factors into account could support workplace health and safety for doctors and protect patients from harm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.