SynthesisBMJ open2026
Assessing the utility of fractional excretion of urea in distinguishing intrinsic and prerenal acute kidney injury in hospitalised patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAcute kidney injury (AKI) is a significant challenge in hospital settings, and accurately differentiating between intrinsic and prerenal AKI is crucial for effective management. The fractional excretion of urea (FEUN) has been proposed as a potential biomarker for this purpose, offering an alternative to traditional markers such as fractional excretion of sodium. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of FEUN for differentiating intrinsic from prerenal AKI in hospitalised patients. DESIGNS: We conducted a systematic review and bivariate random effects meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. The study followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to 1 November 2023. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: We included observational studies that focused on patient with AKI and reported FEUN data sufficient to reconstruct a complete 2 × 2 contingency table (true positives, true negatives, false positives and false negatives) for evaluating its diagnostic accuracy. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers extracted data, assessed risk of bias with Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 and graded certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) were calculated; heterogeneity was measured with I². A prespecified subgroup restricted to patients receiving diuretics served as a sensitivity analysis.
results12 studies involving 1240 patients were included, with an overall occurrence rate of intrinsic AKI of 38.8%. FEUN had a pooled sensitivity of 0.74 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.84) and specificity of 0.78 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.87), with positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 0.76 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.83) and 0.74 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.81), respectively. The SROC curve showed a pooled diagnostic accuracy of 0.83. Heterogeneity was substantial (I²>90%) for sensitivity and specificity. In a diuretic-only subgroup (six studies) specificity rose to 0.87 and heterogeneity declined (I²=56%). Overall certainty of evidence was low owing to inconsistency.
conclusionsFEUN is a biomarker with moderate diagnostic accuracy for differentiating between intrinsic and prerenal AKI in hospitalised patients. Its application could enhance AKI management; however, the high heterogeneity observed in our study highlights the need for further research to evaluate its utility across diverse patient populations and clinical settings. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024496083.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.