Observational studyInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2026
A Prospective Observational Study of AUDIT-based Risk Stratification and Drinking Guidance Provided by Hepatologists in Patients with Alcoholic Liver Disease.
Observational study in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective Alcoholic liver disease is the leading cause of cirrhosis and liver failure in Japan. We assessed hepatologist-led interventions stratified using the alcohol use disorder identification test. Methods This was a single-center, prospective study. Outcomes included total alcohol consumption, number of heavy drinking days, drinking risk level, and liver function over 24 weeks. Patients Patients with chronic liver disease were stratified into three groups according to alcohol use disorder identification test scores: <10 (education only), 10-19 (hepatologist-led intervention), and ≥20 (psychiatric referral). Patients in the hepatologist-led group received drinking guidance, psychosocial support, and nalmefene, when indicated. Results Between August 2022 and September 2025, 932 patients were screened; 823, 78, and 31 had alcohol use disorder identification test scores of <10, 10-19, and ≥20 points, respectively. Of the 78 patients in the hepatologist-led intervention group, 74 completed follow-up. In this group, median total alcohol consumption decreased from 63.1 to 35.1 g/day (p=0.001) and heavy-drinking days from 17.0 to 11.3 days/month (p=0.002). Drinking risk level downstaging was achieved in 52 patients (70.2%), who showed significant improvements in aspartate aminotransferase (p=0.027) and γ-GTP (p=0.014) levels and experienced fewer cirrhosis-related complications in comparison to patients without downstaging. Logistic regression identified baseline hepatocellular carcinoma as an independent predictor of drinking risk-level downstaging (odds ratio, 5.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-15.3). Conclusion Hepatologist-led alcohol use disorder identification test-based management of alcoholic liver disease reduces alcohol intake. Drinking risk-level downstaging has been linked to improved liver biochemistry and clinical outcomes, offering a practical strategy in which psychiatric resources are limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.