ArticleEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2026
Associations with, and predictors of, progression in systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease: a scoping literature review.
Article in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A syndromic framework for progressive pulmonary fibrosis.Respiratory research · 2026Review
- Serum metabolic characteristics of interstitial lung disease: a potential link between endocrine aging and gut-derived metabolites.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProgressive systemic sclerosis-related interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in systemic sclerosis (Ssc). Yet, there remains no consensus definition of interstitial lung disease (ILD) progression or risk stratification tool to aid in identifying for whom and when therapeutic intervention is warranted or which patients should be included in clinical trials because they are especially at risk of progressive disease.
objectiveWe aimed to determine from the literature which variables were consistently associated with SSc-ILD and, more importantly, which have been demonstrated to be predictors of progression.
methodsWe used two electronic databases, EMBASE and PubMed, to perform a scoping literature review of published articles on SSc-ILD, with a primary focus on ILD progression. Any variables reported to be associated with or predictive of ILD progression were recorded.
resultsOf the 1327 citations identified, 56 full-text articles were included in this scoping review. Most studies assessed the association of baseline variables with ILD progression and were not true assessments of the predictive value of these variables. In fact, analysis of the literature revealed a lack of a clear consensus definition for ILD progression. As such, there is a paucity of variables that can predict with confidence which patients will show ILD progression. Only one variable, the serological biomarker KL-6, was found to be consistently predictive of progression.
conclusionsSignificant knowledge gaps remain in our ability to predict individuals at risk of progressive SSc-ILD. Given the significant morbidity and mortality associated with progressive ILD, identifying these patients and their successful enrolment in clinical therapeutic trials is of the upmost importance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.