ReviewSeminars in liver disease2026
Patient-Derived Models of Liver Cancer to Inform Clinical Treatment Paradigms: Recent Updates.
Review in Seminars in liver disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Primary liver cancer remains a global health challenge due to rising incidence, limited curative options, and poor overall survival. Poor outcomes stem from tumor heterogeneity, limited efficacy of current therapies, and comorbid chronic liver disease. Despite recent advances in immunotherapy and combination treatments, response rates remain low, and predictive biomarkers are lacking. As a result, there is an urgent need for preclinical models that capture the molecular, cellular, and immune landscape of primary liver cancer. This review discusses the strengths and limitations of patient-derived models of liver cancer, including two-dimensional patient-derived cell lines (PDCL), three-dimensional (3D) patient-derived tumor organoids (PDTOs), and patient-derived xenografts (PDXs). While PDCLs and PDTOs enable high throughput studies, they lack a representative tumor microenvironment. PDXs, including PDXs in animals with humanized immune systems, may more effectively mimic tumor-environment interactions but are costly, complex, and still contain mouse stromal cells. Ex vivo tissue culture preserves tissue structure and cell-cell interactions in an immunocompetent environment; however, short duration of viable culture limits broader application. Continued innovation in the development of multicellular three-dimensional culture systems and in vivo humanization strategies will play a critical role in enabling the development of more personalized and effective therapies for primary liver cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.