ReviewAnnals of epidemiology2026
Is artificial intelligence a friend or foe to epidemiology?
Review in Annals of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Epidemiology has long been central to public health, guiding our understanding of the distribution and determinants of disease. As the field has evolved-from John Snow's cholera investigations to large-scale cohort studies and causal inference frameworks-it now faces a transformative juncture with the advent of artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML). These technologies offer unprecedented opportunities to improve data measurement, inference, and population health insights, yet also pose methodological and ethical challenges. Anchored by the core epidemiologic domains of study population, measurement, and inference, we examine how epidemiologists can use AI/ML effectively. We consider the importance of careful population definition, informed sampling, and external validation to ensure generalizability and minimize bias when AI/ML is used. We also explore the need for rigorous assessment of data quality and model reliability, which strengthens the case for conceptual frameworks in guiding interpretation of scientific investigations. To realize AI/ML's potential, epidemiology must adapt its training, invest in infrastructure, and promote interdisciplinary collaboration. Doing so will ensure that epidemiologic science remains robust, reproducible, and relevant in a rapidly evolving informational landscape. This moment calls for a strategic integration of AI/ML into the fabric of epidemiologic practice and training to advance both science and public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.