ArticleCell systems2026
Disobind: A sequence-based, partner-dependent contact map and interface residue predictor for intrinsically disordered regions.
Article in Cell systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Methylome profiling of SetDB1-deficient ESCs reveals coordinated epigenetic cross-talk during pluripotency.Stem cell reports · 2026Article
- Multicomplex Integrative Structural Modeling of a Human Histone Deacetylase Interactome.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2026Article
- SPPIDER-seq: sequence-based partner-aware predictor of protein-protein interaction sites.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- SPPIDER-seq: Sequence-based partner-aware predictor of protein-protein interaction sites.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- IDBSpred: An intrinsically disordered binding site predictor using machine learning and protein language model.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Multicomplex Integrative Structural Modeling of a Human Histone Deacetylase Interactome.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intrinsically disordered proteins or regions (IDPs or IDRs) adopt diverse binding modes with different partners, ranging from coupled folding and binding to fuzzy binding and fully disordered binding. Characterizing IDR interfaces is challenging both experimentally and computationally. State-of-the-art tools such as AlphaFold multimer and AlphaFold3 can be used to predict IDR binding sites, although they are less accurate at their benchmarked confidence cutoffs. Here, we developed Disobind, a deep-learning method that predicts inter-protein contact maps and interface residues for an IDR and its partner, given their sequences. It uses sequence embeddings from the ProtT5 protein language model. Disobind outperforms state-of-the-art interface predictors for IDRs. It also outperforms AlphaFold multimer and AlphaFold3 at multiple confidence cutoffs. Combining Disobind and AlphaFold-multimer predictions further improves performance. In contrast to current methods, Disobind considers the context of the binding partner and does not depend on structures and multiple sequence alignments. Its predictions can be used to localize IDRs in large assemblies and characterize IDR-mediated interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41534519What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.