ArticleVirology2026
Selective reactivation of latent HIV using CyclinT1-Tat-containing virus-like particles.
Article in Virology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The persistence of HIV reservoirs and their ability to create an active infection after anti-retroviral therapy cessation has prevented development of an HIV cure. Various chemical latency reversal agents (LRAs) have been investigated to promote HIV transcription as part of a kick and kill strategy, but many of these agents lack either potency or specificity and can cause widespread T cell activation and systemic toxicity. We report the development of novel virus-like particles (VLPs), based on HIV itself, that carry a CyclinT1-Tat fusion protein (CycTat) and reactivate HIV from latency both alone and synergistically with the two tested chemical LRAs; a bromodomain inhibitor and a protein kinase C agonist. CycTat resulted in higher reactivation than Tat, although Tat and CycTat delivery were equivalent in some cell lines after co-stimulation with LRAs thought to increase cellular P-TEFb levels. Targeted mutations disrupting key residues in Tat and CycT1 interactions dampened reactivation, suggesting the particles work mechanistically as anticipated. Fusion of VLPs with target cells was required for HIV reactivation, demonstrating that CycTat proteins do not non-specifically cross cell membranes when packaged into VLPs. Additionally, we addressed safety concerns by testing high doses of VLPs on primary CD4
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.