Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41533969›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2026

A minimal physiological model of perceptual suppression and breakthrough in visual rivalry.

Christopher J Whyte, Hugh R Wilson, James M Shine, David Alais

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christopher J WhyteCentre for Complex Systems, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Hugh R WilsonCentre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
James M ShineCentre for Complex Systems, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
David AlaisSchool of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual rivalry paradigms provide a powerful tool for probing the mechanisms of visual awareness and perceptual suppression. Although the dynamics and determinants of perceptual switches in visual rivalry have been extensively studied and modeled, recent advances in experimental design-particularly those that quantify the depth and variability of perceptual suppression-have outpaced the development of computational models. Here we extend an existing dynamical model of binocular rivalry to encompass two novel experimental paradigms: a threshold detection variant of binocular rivalry, and tracking continuous flash suppression. Together, these tasks provide complementary measures of the dynamics and magnitude of perceptual suppression. Through numerical simulation, we demonstrate that a single mechanism, competitive (hysteretic) inhibition between slowly adapting monocular populations, is sufficient to account for the suppression depth findings across both paradigms. This unified model offers a foundation for the development of a quantitative theory of perceptual suppression in visual rivalry.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalVision, BinocularVision DisparityVisual PerceptionComputer SimulationHumansPhotic StimulationSensory Thresholds

Identifiers

PMID41533969
PMCPMC12805966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.