ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025
Letter Distortion Mapping in Amblyopia: Spatial Patterns, Stability, and Relationship to Visual Acuity.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neurophysiological basis for visual distortions in amblyopia.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Rethinking perceptual distortions in amblyopia: toward a multi-feature, visual-field-wide perspective.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate whether letter-based perceptual distortions in amblyopia follow spatially consistent patterns across different letters and to determine if these spatial distortion maps are letter specific or reflect a common underlying spatial organization of visual distortion in the amblyopic eye. Methods: Twenty-one individuals with amblyopia completed a distortion mapping task using the letters A, D, and E, shown at 36 visual field locations. Each letter was first viewed with the fellow eye and then with the amblyopic eye. Participants reported distortions, which were recorded to generate binary spatial maps. The task was repeated over three sessions to assess within-subject consistency, and spatial correlations were analyzed across letters and subjects. Results: Letter distortions were reported by 95% of participants and remained consistent across sessions. Within subjects, spatial distortion maps were significantly correlated across letters in 62% of cases (P ≤ 0.028), suggesting shared spatial patterns. However, across subjects, maps were largely uncorrelated, indicating individualized distortion profiles. No single letter consistently showed more distortion across the group, χ2(2) = 1.279, P = 0.5. A strong positive correlation was found between interocular visual acuity difference and overall distortion intensity (r = 0.70, P < 0.001), consistent across all letters. Conclusions: Letter distortions in amblyopia are highly prevalent, reliable, and spatially organized within individuals but idiosyncratic across subjects. These distortions correlate strongly with visual acuity loss, highlighting their potential as a clinically valuable and perceptually relevant measure for characterizing amblyopic visual dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.