ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2026
Multimodal Deep Learning Differentiates Papilledema and Non-Arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy From Healthy Eyes.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Optic nerve head (ONH) swelling, a critical feature in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) and non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION), can present diagnostic challenges. We explored a multimodal deep learning (DL) approach integrating optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans and fundus photographs to enhance diagnostic accuracy for differentiating IIH, NAION, and healthy eyes. Methods: We developed two separate models using 7019 OCT scans (3D-ResNet-18) and 17,657 fundus photos (ResNet-50) to classify eyes with papilledema (2315 OCT, 6349 fundus), NAION (841 OCT, 1814 fundus), and healthy eyes (3863 OCT, 9494 fundus). We arranged the dataset so that the test set consisted entirely of same-day OCT scans and fundus photos, with each modality (OCT and fundus) contributing at least 15% of the data for each class. We combined output probabilities from both models using two methods: an F1-weighted sum by class (F1WS), as well as an XGBoost model. Performance of each was evaluated with AUC-ROC, accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 scores. Results: The OCT model alone achieved a test accuracy of 93.5%, with the fundus photo model reaching 93.9%. The multimodal F1WS and XGBoost models achieved an accuracy of 97.5% and 98.3%, respectively. Conclusions: Combining OCT and fundus photographs improves the classification of IIH, NAION, and healthy eyes, showing the value of using complementary imaging modalities. This approach supports the use of DL to aid diagnosis and clinical management of optic nerve head swelling. It may also be extended to leverage DL from additional data sources, such as macular scans or visual field tests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.