Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41533896›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2026

Uncovering atypical gaze patterns in cerebral visual impairment: New insights from an exploratory gaze-based analysis.

Nilsu Saglam, Lotfi B Merabet, Zahide Pamir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nilsu SaglamDepartment of Psychology, Bilkent University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Lotfi B MerabetThe Laboratory for Visual Neuroplasticity, Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Zahide PamirDepartment of Psychology, Bilkent University, Ankara, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals with cerebral visual impairment (CVI) often struggle with visuospatial processing, particularly in highly cluttered or complex environments. These challenges are commonly assessed through visual search tasks, using global measures such as reaction time (RT), accuracy, and search area. Accordingly, impaired search performance in CVI manifests as longer RTs, lower accuracy, and broader search areas. However, rather than elucidating the underlying mechanism of the impaired search process, these measures decode its outcome. In the present study, we utilized eye-tracking data to compute detailed measures of fixation count and duration, aiming to characterize gaze pattern sequences and determine whether prolonged RTs in CVI stem from slower visual scanning or increased fixation counts. Our reanalysis of two previously published datasets reveals that longer RTs in CVI arise from elevated fixation counts, specifically on distractors, rather than from slower visual scanning. Our findings indicate recurrent disruptions in maintaining gaze on the target, likely reflecting difficulties in sustaining attention on the target, suppressing distractors, and preventing inhibition of return. Together, these findings highlight an inefficient search pattern that is more biased toward distractors than focused on targets. By revealing these underlying mechanisms, gaze-based measures offer a deeper understanding of visuospatial processing deficits in CVI.

Indexed as

AttentionFixation, OcularVision DisordersAdultEye-Tracking TechnologyFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeSpace PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41533896
PMCPMC12786391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.