ArticleJournal of vision2026
What affects the movement can be seen from the movement: Effects of optical information and dynamical constraints on movement production and perception.
Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates how optical information and dynamical constraints influence movement production and perception. In Experiment 1, 16 volunteers walked or performed a Y-balance movement with and without sight on sturdy or foam-padded floors. The optical information and force environment affected the participants' kinematics, such as stride duration, stride length, stride width, gait speed, joint ranges of motion for walking, total movement duration, and joint ranges of motion for Y-balance. Naïve observers then watched these movements on a point-light display and distinguished movements executed under different optical information (Experiment 2) and force environment (Experiment 3) conditions. They were able to pick out movements performed without sight, especially for those performed on a padded floor; they were also able to discriminate movements performed on different supporting surfaces, especially when the actors were blindfolded. Thus, discriminating movement conditions from point-light displays was possible, and better with higher kinematic variability. Logistic regressions showed discriminating movements relied on the movement kinematics that varied the most between conditions. This information was valid and useful regardless of viewing perspective; that is, whether the walking and Y-balance were displayed in the frontal or side view, the perceptual performance was equivalent. Thus, both optical information and dynamical constraints shape movement patterns in ways that are perceptible through the kinematic variations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.