Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41533894›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2026

Mapping the visual cortex with Zebra noise and wavelets.

Sophie Skriabine, Maxwell Shinn, Samuel Picard, Kenneth D Harris, Matteo Carandini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sophie SkriabineUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK.
Maxwell ShinnUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Samuel PicardUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Kenneth D HarrisUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Matteo CarandiniUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

Optimization, Application, and Dissemination of Imaging Modules for High-speed Mesoscopic Volumetric Recording of Neuroactivity in Scattering BrainsU01NS126057 · NINDS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI VAZIRI, ALIPASHA · 2022 to 2025
$5.0M
NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS126057Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of the early visual system often require characterizing the visual preferences of large populations of neurons. This task typically requires multiple stimuli such as sparse noise and drifting gratings, each of which probes only a limited set of visual features. Here, we introduce a new dynamic stimulus with sharp-edged stripes that we term Zebra noise and a new analysis model based on wavelets, and we show that in combination they are highly efficient for mapping multiple aspects of the visual preferences of thousands of neurons. We used two-photon calcium imaging to record the activity of neurons in the mouse visual cortex. Zebra noise elicited strong responses that were more repeatable than those evoked by traditional stimuli. The wavelet-based model captured the repeatable aspects of the resulting responses, providing measures of neuronal tuning for multiple stimulus features: position, orientation, size, spatial frequency, drift rate, and direction. The method proved efficient, requiring only 5 minutes of stimulus (repeated three times) to characterize the tuning of thousands of neurons across visual areas. In combination, the Zebra noise stimulus and the wavelet-based model provide a broadly applicable toolkit for the rapid characterization of visual representations, promising to accelerate future studies of visual function.

Indexed as

Brain MappingNeuronsVisual CortexWavelet AnalysisAnimalsMiceModels, NeurologicalPhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41533894
PMCPMC12782197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.