ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2026
Prediction of Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities Using Atomic Surface Site Interaction Points.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atom surface site Interaction Points (AIP) which were previously used to predict association constants for synthetic host-guest systems has been extended to protein-ligand complexes. AIP descriptions of protein binding sites were obtained by combining a library of precomputed AIP descriptors for all protein functional groups with a graph-based substructure matching algorithm. The corresponding AIP description of ligands was obtained directly by footprinting the molecular electrostatic potential surface calculated using density functional theory. These AIP descriptions were projected onto X-ray crystal structures of protein-ligand complexes to identify pairs of AIPs that were sufficiently close in space to constitute an intermolecular interaction. The overall free energy of binding was calculated by summing the contributions of each AIP contact and associated desolvation. Application to the 94 complexes involving uncharged ligands in CASF benchmark data set showed that the method achieves a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.76 and an RMSD of 11 kJ mol
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.