ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2026
AI-Based RGB Image Generation From RG Fundus Images Using Pix2Pix: Validation by Quantitative and Observer-Based Evaluations.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and perceptual quality of red-green-blue (RGB) fundus images generated from red-green (RG) images using Pix2Pix-based generative adversarial network (GAN). Methods: RG images were extracted from original RGB images recorded by a newer model of the Optos system by turning off the blue laser source. A conditional GAN based on the Pix2Pix architecture was trained to convert this extracted RG image to an RGB image. The performance was evaluated quantitatively by using a five-fold cross-validation and assessments with structural similarity index measure (SSIM), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), learned perceptual image patch similarity (LPIPS), mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean square error (RMSE). To assess the perceptual accuracy, 39 ophthalmologists examined 60 randomly selected images, 30 true and 30 generated RGB images, using Google Form-based interface. They were instructed to classify each image as a true or an artificial intelligence (AI)-generated image. Results: The generated images had high similarity to the original RGB images (SSIM = 0.97 ± 0.00; PSNR = 35.74 ± 0.17 decibel [dB]; LPIPS = 0.09 ± 0.00; MAE = 1.76 ± 0.04; and RMSE = 4.25 ± 0.10). The overall correct classification rate was 57.1%. Certain lesion types, such as epiretinal membrane and optic disc cupping, had higher discrimination rates. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis across all evaluations yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.497 (P = 0.314). Conclusions: Pix2Pix-based GANs can generate perceptually and structurally consistent RGB images from RG images without lesion-specific attention mechanisms. Translational Relevance: This method enables a reinterpretation of legacy RG fundus images and may support future AI diagnostic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.