ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2026
Corneoscleral Morphology in Keratoconus and Its Association With Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of the loss of tenascin X on tissue architecture and wound healing of the murine corneal stroma.The ocular surface · 2026Article
- Clinical evaluation of corneal elasticity and true IOP using a dual-applanation tonometer.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To characterize corneoscleral morphology in keratoconus versus normal eyes via anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and investigate its relationship with Scheimpflug-based corneal tomography and corneal biomechanics. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 43 keratoconus and 74 control eyes. AS-OCT imaging was conducted across superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal meridians at the corneoscleral limbus. Chord-based scleral and corneal curvature were assessed at 5 mm (SclCurv5, CorCurv5) and at 2.5 mm (SclCurv2.5, CorCurv2.5) from the scleral spur. The corneoscleral junction angle (CSJA) was also analyzed. Group and meridian differences were evaluated, and associations with corneal tomography (Pentacam) and biomechanics (Corvis ST) were explored. Results: Keratoconic eyes exhibited a distinct corneoscleral architectural pattern compared to controls, characterized by greater vertical asymmetry in SclCurv5 and CorCurv5, as well as flatter inferior SclCurv2.5 and flatter inferior and temporal CorCurv5 (all P < 0.05). Within the keratoconus group, a larger superior CSJA was associated with a more favorable profile of corneal tomographic and biomechanical parameters, including lower maximum keratometry, exp(β) = 0.95, P = 0.002; a lower topographic keratoconus classification grade, exp(β) = 0.54, P = 0.038; and greater thickness-profile-integrated stiffness, as measured by Ambrósio's relational thickness horizontal, exp(β) = 1.10, P = 0.027. Conclusions: Keratoconus involves significant alterations in corneoscleral architecture beyond the cornea itself. A larger superior CSJA emerged as a significant independent predictor of a milder disease phenotype among keratoconus patients. Translational Relevance: A larger superior CSJA may indicate a slower disease progression, aiding in personalized monitoring and management planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.