ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2026
Biophysical Interactions of Silicon Quantum Dots With Human Tears and Dry Eye Drops: A Langmuir Trough Study.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Silicon quantum dots (Si-QDs) have emerged for nanoscale bioimaging of the tear film. However, their biophysical impact on the tear film is unknown. This study investigates the interfacial interactions of Si-QDs with human tears and dry eye drops. Methods: Surface pressure-area isotherms of Si-QDs, human tears, dry eye drops, and their combinations were recorded using a Langmuir Blodgett trough over a 15-75 cm² area. Samples (10 or 40 µL) were applied to the air-water interface and subjected to five compression-expansion cycles at 10 mm/min. Surface pressure was measured with a Wilhelmy plate and analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn-Bonferroni correction (P < 0.05). Results: Amphiphilic Si-QDs exhibited higher surface pressure (30 mN/m) than hydrophilic Si-QDs (20 mN/m). Combined with tears or drops, amphiphilic Si-QDs showed enhanced interfacial retention at 10 µL, particularly with lipid-rich formulations. The highest surface pressure (50 mN/m) was observed with amphiphilic Si-QDs and Systane. Both Si-QDs demonstrated strong interfacial stability with Cationorm, whereas minimal interaction with TheraTears was observed, likely because of QD partitioning into the phosphate-buffered saline solution (PBS) subphase. At 40 µL, surface pressure decreased across all combinations. Conclusions: Si-QDs are surface-active at the air-PBS interface. Amphiphilic Si-QDs interact with lipids and mimic the behavior of surfactants, whereas hydrophilic Si-QDs remain compatible with an aqueous phase. Translational Relevance: This study highlights the potential of Si-QDs in real-time layer-specific imaging of the tear film and targeted drug delivery for dry eye disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.