ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2026
Glaucoma Classification Through SSVEP-Derived ON- and OFF-Pathway Features.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-based analysis of visual electrophysiological signals for clinical interpretation support.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: This work aims to evaluate the relative contribution of the amplitude and phase of both ON- and OFF-pathway biased steady-state visually evoked potentials (SSVEPs) to the classification of patients with glaucoma from healthy controls. Methods: SSVEPs were recorded for sawtooth luminance increments (ON-biasing) and decrements (OFF-biasing), modulating at a temporal frequency of 2.73 Hz. SSVEP data from 98 adults with glaucoma and 71 controls were used to train a set of logistic regressions. Data were partitioned prior to training to investigate the relative contribution to classification for amplitude and phase features derived from ON- versus OFF-pathway stimulation. Results: We report moderate overall classification accuracy (area under the curve ∼0.7). Classification based solely on signal phase features significantly outperformed classification based solely on signal amplitude features. Classification using OFF-pathway biasing features produced a statistically significant improvement in classification only when training on signal amplitude features. This OFF advantage was not conserved in a dataset with low signal-to-noise eyes removed. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the informational value of signal phase, a metric often omitted in applications of the SSVEP to glaucoma and other optic neuropathies. Additionally, our results suggest that OFF-pathway amplitude features may be less vulnerable to the limitations imposed by a low signal-to-noise ratio. However, they are not indicative of a gross difference in glaucoma classification performance between ON- and OFF-pathway biased features. Translational Relevance: Electrophysiological estimates of visual signal delay should be considered in future clinical diagnostic tools as they make a material contribution to the classification of glaucomatous eyes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.