ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2026
Information extraction from clinical notes: are we ready to switch to large language models?
Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated Identification of Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention from Cardiac Catheterization Reports using Large Language Models.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Hierarchical multi-label structuring of Japanese SOAP clinical notes with large language models.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The Performance of Large Language Models in Extracting Intestinal Symptoms From Electronic Health Records: Retrospective Observational Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Observational
- Computable Phenotype for Identifying Undiagnosed Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome: Protocol for a Development and Validation Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Extracting Medical Information From Unstructured Clinical Text Using Large Language Models to Enhance Health Care Interoperability: Proof-of-Concept Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Large language models for zero-shot procedure extraction in orthopedic surgery: a comparative evaluation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- An Entity-Based Visual Analytics System Enhancing Medical Expertise Acquisition: Development and Verification Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Disease Risk Prediction Using Structured EHR Data: Can Generalist Large Language Models Match Specialized Clinical Foundation Models? A Comparative Evaluation with Fine-Tuning.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- A Sentence Classification-Based Medical Status Extraction Pipeline for Electronic Health Records: Institutional Case Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- SynthEHR-eviction: enhancing eviction SDoH detection with LLM-augmented synthetic EHR data.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- LitTx: A New Treatment Relation Extraction Dataset.LREC ... International Conference on Language Resources & Evaluation : [proceedings]. International Conference on Language Resources & Evaluation · 2026Article
- Enhancing substance use detection in clinical notes with large language models.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2025Article
- Toward Cross-Hospital Deployment of Natural Language Processing Systems: Model Development and Validation of Fine-Tuned Large Language Models for Disease Name Recognition in Japanese.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Adapting Generative Large Language Models for Information Extraction from Unstructured Electronic Health Records in Residential Aged Care: A Comparative Analysis of Training Approaches.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2025Article
- Enhancing Substance Use Detection in Clinical Notes with Large Language Models.Research square · 2025Article
- Patient and clinician acceptability of automated extraction of social drivers of health from clinical notes in primary care.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- Employing Consensus-Based Reasoning with Locally Deployed LLMs for Enabling Structured Data Extraction from Surgical Pathology Reports.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- A survey of NLP methods for oncology in the past decade with a focus on cancer registry applications.Artificial intelligence review · 2025Article
- Addressing Generalizability in Clinical Named Entity Recognition: Federated Learning or Large Language Models?: A Case Study on Visual Acuity Extraction from US and UK Eye Institutes.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the performance, generalizability, and computational efficiency of instruction-tuned Large Language Model Meta AI (LLaMA)-2 and LLaMA-3 models compared to bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) for clinical information extraction (IE) tasks, specifically named entity recognition (NER) and relation extraction (RE). MATERIALS AND
methodsWe developed a comprehensive annotated corpus of 1588 clinical notes from 4 data sources-UT Physicians (UTP) (1342 notes), Transcribed Medical Transcription Sample Reports and Examples (MTSamples) (146), Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-III (50), and Informatics for Integrating Biology and the Bedside (i2b2) (50), capturing 4 clinical entities (problems, tests, medications, other treatments) and 16 modifiers (eg, negation, certainty). Large Language Model Meta AI-2 and LLaMA-3 were instruction-tuned for clinical NER and RE, and their performance was benchmarked against BERT.
resultsLarge Language Model Meta AI models consistently outperformed BERT across datasets. In data-rich settings (eg, UTP), LLaMA achieved marginal gains (approximately 1% improvement for NER and 1.5%-3.7% for RE). Under limited data conditions (eg, MTSamples, MIMIC-III) and on the unseen i2b2 dataset, LLaMA-3-70B improved F1 scores by over 7% for NER and 4% for RE. However, performance gains came with increased computational costs, with LLaMA models requiring more memory and Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) hours and running up to 28 times slower than BERT. DISCUSSION: While LLaMA models offer enhanced performance, their higher computational demands and slower throughput highlight the need to balance performance with practical resource constraints. Application-specific considerations are essential when choosing between LLMs and BERT for clinical IE.
conclusionInstruction-tuned LLaMA models show promise for clinical NER and RE tasks. However, the tradeoff between improved performance and increased computational cost must be carefully evaluated. We release our Kiwi package (https://kiwi.clinicalnlp.org/) to facilitate the application of both LLaMA and BERT models in clinical IE applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.