ArticleIET systems biology
Machine Learning-based Diagnostic Potential of Bipolar Disorder Using Gut Microbiota Signatures.
Article in IET systems biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dysbiosis of nasal microbiota associated with hippocampal neuroimmune alterations in a mouse model of eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-based Diagnostic Potential of Bipolar Disorder Using Gut Microbiota Signatures.IET systems biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bipolar disorder (BD) is a chronic psychiatric illness associated with significant cognitive and social dysfunction, contributing substantially to the global disease burden. Recent evidence suggests that the gut microbiota may play a role in the pathophysiology of BD through the microbiota-gut-brain axis. To clarify this potential link and explore diagnostic applications, we investigated gut microbial alterations in BD and evaluated their predictive value using 16S rRNA sequencing and machine learning approaches. We first assessed microbial diversity and composition, revealing significantly reduced α-diversity and altered β-diversity in BD compared to healthy controls (HC), alongside weakened microbial co-occurrence network connectivity. Given these compositional differences, we systematically benchmarked 12 classification algorithms to discriminate BD from HC. Ensemble-based models, particularly the random forest (RF) classifier, achieved the best diagnostic performance. To further improve predictive accuracy, we compared multiple feature selection methods: RF feature importance ranking, independent t-tests and MaAsLin2 analysis, identifying 35 optimal microbial biomarkers based on RF. This feature set demonstrated excellent classification performance (AUC = 0.9316, AUPR = 0.9497). Furthermore, based on the taxonomic findings, we applied PICRUSt2 functional prediction using KEGG and MetaCyc annotations, which revealed marked alterations in pathways related to neurodegeneration, lipid metabolism and heme biosynthesis. Finally, to capture both compositional and functional aspects of microbial dysbiosis, we combined these functional features with the selected microbial biomarkers in an RF model, achieving further improved diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.9499, AUPR = 0.9586). In conclusion, our results demonstrate substantial compositional and functional disturbances in the gut microbiota of BD and highlight the value of machine learning-driven, microbiome-based models for noninvasive BD diagnosis. The identified microbial and metabolic markers also provide mechanistic insights into the microbiota-gut-brain axis, offering promising directions for precision psychiatry and microbiome-targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.